What is an is, or a was, or an ought? Ought a was to be an is? Is a musician a musician, or simply a man with a musical thought? Is a shooter only a man with a gun? Is existence existence, or is it every thing together as one? What is a thing? Which thing is the essence of thingness? Is a thing a thing? There are too many things to name them all. After all, any thing can be a thing, which includes everything as being a thing. Thingness is not absolute. One can be two things at once.  A man has two hundred and six bones in his body. That's only counting bones. Imagine how many dissimilar things make up the human thing, and each in their own wild numbers. So when things are talked about, they mean countless other things. It's all to easy to forget or look away from the the things that make up the things that are meant. There are two levels of thingness: Thingness in here, and thingness out there. The thingness out there is like water. It keeps on changing as it flows through itself. The thingness in here is part of the thingness out there. But in the sea of thingness, comes a wave of thingness. And this wave knows that it's a wave, but forgot that it's a sea. Why should there be a wave? I suppose the wave is caused by the friction of the thingness crashing into itself, ever falling into . . . infinity.

Why?

I should get used to the notion that being is being without cause or desire. To be being simply is and it ought not to worry or fear or be lonely, just to be being, is all it can be . . . But to say that it ought not, is to say that it ought. But it is and not ought, and the things that are are the ought and the is, it is being.

What can we do?

Or perhaps...

What will being do to us?